How the 12 Disciples Died Validates Christianity

Most people know that Jesus had a group of disciples traveling with him during his ministry. However, most are unaware of how these followers eventually died. Perhaps we will discover that how the 12 disciples died validates Christianity.

The style and manner of the twelve apostles’ deaths really helps us gain insight and perspective. These death accounts provide us a glimpse into the state of the times and the people under Rome. How the 12 disciples died also indicates the powerful and unwavering loyalty they had for Jesus Christ.

These death accounts are accumulated from a wide spectrum of sources. Reports of how the 12 disciples died come from sources like the New Testament, apocryphal texts, as well as various legends and stories. This eclectic range of references provides more credibility for the historical accuracy of these accounts. After all, the more sources you have from differing origins, the more persuasive the evidence is.

Don’t believe Jesus Christ was a historical figure? Read about 9 extra-Biblical sources supporting Jesus Christ.

How the 12 Disciples Died

1) How Apostle Simon Peter died: Crucified upside down

Originally called Peter but later renamed, Simon would be eventually appointed by Jesus Christ as the head disciple. Previously a fisherman in Bethsaida, he became a “fisher of men” after being the first apostle chosen by Jesus. Apostle Simon Peter was eventually sentenced to death by Rome under the emperor Nero.

Simon died between 33-34 years after the death of Jesus, around 66 AD. According to the records, Simon Peter died from upside down crucifixion. Simon Peter allegedly asked to be crucified upside down so that his death would not detract from Christ’s ultimate sacrifice.

2) How Apostle James the Greater died: Beheaded

The Apostle James, also known as James the Greater, was the son Zebedee. He is one of three different James referenced in the New Testament. Additionally, James the Greater is commonly confused with James the brother of Jesus.

James was arrested under the newly appointed governor of Judea, Herod Agrippa. James was turned in by an anonymous accuser and taken to the place of execution.

According to Acts 12:1-19, James was “killed by the sword” in a beheading around 44 AD or 11 years after the death of Jesus. His unnamed accuser was beheaded with him as well, after a change of heart lead him to immediately convert to Christianity.

3) How Apostle John died: Old age

John’s death account is unique for the fact that he was the only original disciple who didn’t die a violent death. Rather, in around 100 AD he passed away in Patmos from old age.

4) How Apostle Simon died: Crucifixion

Apostle Simon was also known as Simon the Canaanite or the Zealot. His ministry was mainly in Mauritania on the west coast of Africa. He later went to England where he was crucified in 74 AD.

5) How Apostle Judas Iscariot died: Suicide by hanging

Judas Iscariot is the infamous disciple who eventually would betray Jesus Christ. Iscariot would turn Jesus over to the high priests for a mere 30 pieces of silver.

According to Matthew 27:3-6, Judas felt immediate remorse after his act of betrayal. So much so that he went off alone and hung himself in Aceldama near Jerusalem.

6) How Apostle Jude / Judas died: Crucifixion

The Apostle Jude, or Thaddaeus, was also known as Judas and commonly referred to as Lebbaeus. Judas ministered in Armenia, Syria and Persia. According to several accounts and stories, he was crucified in Edessa in 72 AD.

7) How Apostle Matthew died: Stabbed

Formerly a tax collector, we know that the Apostle Matthew lived a long time after the death of Christ. Matthew was the author of the New Testament book Matthew, which was written at least 20 years after the death of Christ.

Matthew’s ministry was primarily to the Persians, Parthians and the Medes. According to legend, Matthew died in Ethiopia after being stabbed in the back by a soldier of King Hertacus. Apparently the murder was due to criticisms Matthew had for the King’s morals.

8) How Apostle Thomas died: Speared

The Apostle Thomas is often known as “doubting Thomas”. His ministry mainly consisted of preaching to the people of Greece and India. Thomas would eventually die by lancing, or by being speared after angering local religious authorities.

9) How Apostle Bartholomew died: Crucified or beheaded

The ministry of Bartholomew is said to have been mainly in India. There are actually a couple different death accounts for the Apostle Bartholomew. One account claims that Bartholomew was crucified, while another describes a brutal death involving him being skinned alive and then beheaded. Either way, the death of Bartholomew was most certainly violent.

10) How Apostle Phillip died: Crucified

The Apostle Phillip lead his ministry mainly throughout Asia. However later, Phillip made his way to Egypt and continued preaching to city of Phrygia. Phillip would eventually die in the Egyptian city of Heliopolis, where he was scourged and thrown in prison. He would later die by crucifixion in 54 AD.

11) How Apostle Andrew died: Crucified

The Apostle Andrew was the brother of Peter, who were both simultaneously recruited by Jesus in Bethsaida. Different traditions claimed that the Andrew preached in Scythia, Greece, Asia Minor and Thrace. According to Dorman Newman, a 15th Century religion historian, Andrew went to western Greece in 69 AD.

Andrew would later suffer a gruesome and heinous death at the hands of Roman proconsul Aegeates. He was initially scourged, and then later tied to a cross rather than nailed, so he would suffer longer before dying. Legend has it that Andrew lived for two days after, where he continued to preach the Gospel to an onlooker.

12) How Apostle James the Less died: Stoned and clubbed

The Apostle James was also known as James the Less, and was the son of Alphaeu. James the Less is known as one of the longest lived apostles behind John. When James was the age of 94, he was beaten and stoned to death by a group of prosecutors, later being dealt the finishing blow by a club to the head.

Conclusion: How the 12 Disciples Died Validates Christianity

How the 12 disciples died is truly a testament to the validity of Christianity. The manner in which these apostles were put to death, contains significant implications for both captor and captive.

On the side of the captor, they specifically chose gruesome and cruel punishments for these defectors. On one hand, these kings chose the most painful and inhumane methods of death, in order to send a clear and concise message that Christianity would not be tolerated. Additionally, these excruciatingly painful methods were also a means to persuade the disciples to detract from their faith and denounce Jesus Christ.

We also gain significant insight on the side of the disciples as well. If these death accounts are historically accurate, then we must assume theses twelve had fervor and zeal for Christ. So much so that they were put to death; inhumanely and violently. Fervor and zeal for something are typically not based off whimsical or capricious beliefs. These character traits implicate a deep and unwavering faith to the doctrine of Christianity.

Charles W. Colson, former chief adviser to President Nixon during 1969 and 1973, explains the powerful implications these death accounts had on the resurrection story of Jesus Christ when he stated:

“I know the resurrection is a fact, and Watergate proved it to me. How? Because 12 men testified they had seen Jesus raised from the dead, then they proclaimed that truth for 40 years, never once denying it. Every one was beaten, tortured, stoned and put in prison. They would not have endured that if it weren’t true. Watergate embroiled 12 of the most powerful men in the world-and they couldn’t keep a lie for three weeks. You’re telling me 12 apostles could keep a lie for 40 years? Absolutely impossible.”


Near Death Experiences: Spiritual Manifestation or Chemical Reaction?

It is difficult to ignore the phenomena of near death experiences happening on a regular basis. There is no shortage of NDE testimonies spanning the entire globe. But are these occurrences authentic, transcendental, spiritual experiences? Or are NDE’s merely a result of chemical reactions in the brain?

Research & data on near death experiences

Before the advent of modern surveys and scientific studies, near death experience testimonials were often written off as subjective, unrelated occurrences. However this stance soon changed as scientific studies began to look into these claims. As the data began pouring in, this phenomena gradually gained traction. After all, a 1992 Gallup poll revealed that 13 million Americans (or 5%) had experienced a near death experience.

And as scientific studies investigating this subject began to emerge, the more patterns and parallels were revealed within the data. On one hand, the quantitative data revealed the abundant frequency in the number of these testimonies. And on the other, the qualitative data reported parallels between similar concepts, themes, motifs, and archetypes of these near death experiences. Patterns began to emerge that seemed too similar to be solely coincidence.

Learn more about near death experience statistics as well as common testimonies.

Near death experiences: A chemical reaction in the brain?

However, now that this data is readily available, skeptics have a new source of distrust. Doubters can no longer ignore the copious amount of data relating to near death experiences. However, now the uncertainty has shifted from the happenings of the phenomena to its causation.

There has been much speculation from people in the scientific community on the topic of NDE’s. A common argument today is that near death experiences are merely a result of chemical reactions in the brain. Researcher Dr. Lakhmir Chawla explains his theory of the cause of NDE’s:

“We think that near-death experiences could be caused by a surge of electrical energy as the brain runs out of oxygen. As blood flow slows down and oxygen levels fall, the brain cells fire one last electrical impulse. It starts in one part of the brain and spreads in a cascade and this may give people vivid mental sensations. We offer this as a potential explanation for the clarity in which many patients have “out of body” experiences when successfully revived from a near-death event.”

Similarly, many other doctors also believe this phenomena is caused by chemical reactions as the brain begins to shutdown. But is this perspective valid? Are near death experiences merely a result of physiological occurrences in the body? Or is there a spiritual, transcendental element to them which this explanation misses?

Near death experiences with no brain activity

But what if near death experiences weren’t caused by chemical reactions in the brain? What if we found NDE testimonies in which the subject had no brain activity present? If this were the case, then the testimony could not be written off as an occurrence in the brain.

In the book titled, “Light and Death”, Cardiologist Dr. Michael Sabom discusses this exact type of experience. He recounts a situation he had with one of his patients, Pam Reynolds (1956-2010). Reynolds was having a rare surgery to remove an aneurysm in her brain. The procedure was called “deep hypothermic cardiac arrest” also nicknamed “standstill”.

The surgery required Reynolds’ body temperature to be lowered to sixty degrees. All autonomic nervous system functions were stopped, essentially killing the patient. Reynolds’ breathing and heartbeat stopped while her brain waves flattened, draining all the blood from her head. It was only after all this that Dr. Sabom could begin surgery on her brain.

Dr. Sabom confirms that during this “standstill” process, Reynold’s was declared brain dead. Dr. Sabom further stated:

“…her electroencephalogram was silent, her brain-stem response was absent, and no blood flowed through her brain. Interestingly, while in this state, she encountered the “deepest” NDE of all Atlanta Study participants.”

Conclusion: Near death experiences are not reliant on brain activity

While having “the deepest NDE of all Atlanta Study participants”, Pam Reynolds had absolutely no brain activity. Dr. Sabom explains that there are three separate clinical tests administered to patients determining if the subject is brain dead. Reynolds passed all three tests, confirming she was clinically brain dead.

However while brain dead, Pam Reynolds had a profound and transforming near death experience. This NDE was not caused by a chemical reaction in the brain, but rather was something transcendental. Reynolds’ experience can only be explained as a genuinely spiritual experience.

The First Step of Atheism Apologetics in an Age of Postmodernism

We find ourselves in very confusing and convoluted times. Our world seems to be experiencing a drastic shift in perception of reality. We seem to be moving from an objective to subjective society with the introduction of postmodernism. In turn, Atheism apologetics must first address this deviation to be effective.

What is Postmodernism Exactly?

But what is postmodernism exactly and how did it begin? What does it mean for us as individuals, or for society as a whole? What are the effects or implications of this philosophy on atheism apologetics?

First, let’s begin with a general definition. The concept of postmodernism can be nebulous and cloudy at times, as it calls into question everything we know about reality. Postmodernism is defined by the Encyclopedia Britannica as:

[A] Western philosophy, a late 20th-century movement characterized by broad skepticism, subjectivism, or relativism; a general suspicion of reason; and an acute sensitivity to the role of ideology in asserting and maintaining political and economic power.

Essentially, postmodernism is a philosophy which asserts that our reality is made up of subjective rather than objective truths. This highly skeptical ideology is based on the assumption that objective reality doesn’t exist. Rather, all reality is subjective, differing from person to person. In turn insinuating that truth depends on individual perspective, interpretation, experience, etc.

We can observe many postmodern viewpoints and instances in our current world. For example, we see this philosophy highly prevalent in the transgender movement happening in the West. In these cases, individuals are claiming to be “non-binary”, or “gender fluid”, not associating with the standard male and female categories. In these situations, the individuals are declaring that their subjective truth holds precedence over their biological one.

Atheism Apologetics with a Postmodernist

1) The First Step of Atheism Apologetics: Establishing Objective Truth

Our current cultural climate in the Western world needs to be taken into account in regards to apologetics. Apologetics must adapt to be able to contend with current opposing philosophies. Hence, the very first step in modern atheism apologetics is absolutely crucial and essential, in order to establish a basis for discussion. Without laying this foundation for the discourse, any attempts from either party will render futile. If both parties do not accept the concept of objective and universal truth(s), then any debate will prove to be impossible.

The opening step for any debate is the establishment of objective or absolute truth. In order to debate anything, it is mandatory that you first presume there are truths which transcend the individual. Truths which are universally consistent, independent from individual interpretation or belief. Fundamental ideas, concepts and beliefs in which both parties in a debate contend to prove.

However, this is the exact opposite perspective of postmodernism. This movement argues a completely opposite philosophy, in which all truth is relative to the individual. All notions of any absolute truth are disregarded, being replaced with relative, constantly changing truths.

But in order to even facilitate a discussion, both parties must first accept objective truth before continuing. If one individual or group does not except this fundamental law of debate, then any discussion would be in vein. Without assuming there are absolute or objective truths, you can no longer assert or persuade any personal ideas and beliefs. For if all truth is relative or subjective as postmodernism claims, then everyone has their own truth, rendering any form of debate obsolete. You can no longer maintain that your ideas are right or another’s are wrong, because truth can bend and contort depending on the person.

Is Postmodernism Valid?

Still, the crucial question of whether or not the postmodern philosophy is valid still remains. Is postmodernism a legitimate world view? Is truth actually relative and not objective? Well if we observe this philosophy closely, many logical holes are revealed.

First, postmodernism immediately contradicts itself at the fundamental level. Postmodernism declares the absolute truth that “there are no absolute truths”. When we examine this concept, we immediately see it blatantly is at odds with itself. The statement that “there are no absolute truths” is in fact an absolute truth, thus undermining itself.

Additionally with the postmodern view of reality, no adherent can ever debate anyone on anything. If a person believes all truth is subjective, then their truths are irrelevant to everyone else’s. There is no longer a platform for debate as debating becomes futile. Hence, anyone which holds this view simultaneously forfeits their ability to debate or even discuss differing viewpoints.

Finally, postmodernism encounters some serious problems in regards to morality as well. If there is no meta truth, then that implies there is also no meta morality. In turn, morality becomes a fluid and flexible concept as well, depending on the individual. This is exactly what led to the atrocities we saw in the 20th century. Learn more about why subjective morality is illogical and dangerous.

Why Subjective Morality is Illogical & Dangerous

Is the concept of morality absolute and objective? Or rather, does it vary from person to person and culture to culture? Is morality fluid and dynamic, or fixed and nonnegotiable? If we look at subjective morality through the lens of recent history, we find it to be not only illogical, but also dangerous.

Subjective Morality vs Objective Morality

So which concept of morality makes more sense? Does the scale or spectrum of morality fluctuate depending on circumstance, situation or personal belief? To begin, let’s define our terms.

Objective Morality

When we discuss objective morality, we are talking about an absolute, unchanging criteria or spectrum for moral and immoral activity. This implies that the concept of good and evil is universal and fixed. Objective morality asserts that it transcends race, creed, culture, time, situations, circumstance, etc. In other words, it is a metaphysical agent, independent from the influence of our world.

Subjective Morality

Subjective morality suggests the opposite of objective morality. It asserts that morality is relative, subject to things like personal beliefs, circumstances, cultures, worldviews, etc. With this school of thought, your morality may be different than mine. Internal and external factors have the ability to mold and blend morality, depending on the individual.

One example of subjective morality is the practice of seppuku or an “honor suicide” by Japanese samurais during battle. If the warriors were defeated or captured in battle, they would kill themselves in order to avoid shame or dishonor. Additionally, the seppuku was a gruesome practice which involved moving the blade left to right within the stomach, essentially disemboweling oneself. However in the eyes of the Japanese at that time, this was a noble and honorable act.

Subjective Morality is Illogical

Let us further examine the concept of subjective morality from a logical and historical standpoint. First, we must logically deconstruct the concept of morality being subjective and relative. Next, we will reference recent history to look for examples of subjective morality in practice. After all, as George Santayana once wisely said:

“Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.”

If morality is subjective like many claim, then there truly is no good or evil. We would no longer have a reference or concept of what is good versus what is evil, for one persons evil might be another person’s good.

Additionally, if you are a proponent of subjective morality then you can no longer condemn, or even classify, another’s actions as “good” or “evil”. Who is to say that your subjective concept of morality is right and the other’s is wrong? If there is no absolute and objective moral compass for comparison, then there is no longer a scale or even reference of right and wrong. “Good” and “evil” would no longer contain any meaning as what they are attempting to describe is always changing. These words could no longer be used to describe people, events, etc.

On one side of the spectrum, we could no longer call things like love, kindness, compassion, grace, “good”. If morality is truly subjective (not only negative but also positive morality), then these character traits aren’t necessarily positive for all people. Nor can we call murder, stealing, war, genocide, etc, evil either.

If subjective morality is true, then categorization of it is totally thrown out of the window. Morality is no longer a polarized concept, but rather a nebulous grey fog of uncertainty. Any discernment between these two poles is impossible because they no longer exist.

Subjective Morality in History: The Danger

It is not hard to imagine how the worldview of subjective morality can become dangerous. If people can no longer gauge right and wrong, what’s to stop injustice, bigotry, violence, etc.? We don’t need to look past the 19th century to see mass genocide morally justified by regime’s subjective ideologies. Native Americans, Jews, Russians, and the Chinese have all suffered from a lack of absolute morality in only the last 100 years. If you believe in complete, subjective morality, then you can no longer speak out against those who exercise it.

Similar Article: “Open Mindedness: Why Too Much is Dangerous

42 Violent Verses in the Quran: Islam a Religion of Peace?

In light of current terrorist attacks carried out by radical Muslims, the religion of Islam has many negative connotations. Many believe that mainstream Islam is getting a bad rap by the media and society. But what does their book teach? We may be surprised what we discover. Let’s examine violent verses in the Quran.

I would like to preface this article first by saying that I have immense respect for the Muslim people. Having Muslim friends growing up, I observed that they were a very respectful and thoughtful people. To this day I still have immense respect and admiration for their devotion to Islam. I believe that the general Muslim people are some of the most pious and reverent people in the world. I think Christians can learn a lot from their dedication and devotion.

That being said, I completely disagree with the Islam religion and belief system. Additionally, if we examine the book of the Quran, we will find some shocking and concerning verses. Below are some violent verses in the Quran.

Violent Verses in the Quran

Quran (2:191-193)

“And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing… but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun(the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)”

Quran (2:244)

“Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things.”

Quran (2:216)

“Fighting has been enjoined upon you while it is hateful to you. But perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you; and perhaps you love a thing and it is bad for you. And Allah Knows, while you know not.”

Quran (3:56)

“And as for those who disbelieved, I will punish them with a severe punishment in this world and the Hereafter, and they will have no helpers.”

Quran (3:151)

“We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve for what they have associated with Allah of which He had not sent down [any] authority. And their refuge will be the Fire, and wretched is the residence of the wrongdoers.”

Quran (4:74)

“So let those fight in the cause of Allah who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter. And he who fights in the cause of Allah and is killed or achieves victory – We will bestow upon him a great reward.”

Quran (4:76)

“Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve fight in the cause of Taghut. So fight against the allies of Satan. Indeed, the plot of Satan has ever been weak.”

Quran (4:89)

“They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah . But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper.”

Quran (4:95)

“Not equal are those believers remaining [at home] – other than the disabled – and the mujahideen, [who strive and fight] in the cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred the mujahideen through their wealth and their lives over those who remain [behind], by degrees. And to both Allah has promised the best [reward]. But Allah has preferred the mujahideen over those who remain [behind] with a great reward -“

Quran (4:101)

“And when you travel throughout the land, there is no blame upon you for shortening the prayer, [especially] if you fear that those who disbelieve may disrupt [or attack] you. Indeed, the disbelievers are ever to you a clear enemy.”

Quran (4:104)

“And do not weaken in pursuit of the enemy. If you should be suffering – so are they suffering as you are suffering, but you expect from Allah that which they expect not. And Allah is ever Knowing and Wise.”

Quran (5:33)

“Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment,”

Quran (8:12)

“[Remember] when your Lord inspired to the angels, ‘I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.’

Quran (8:15)

“O you who have believed, when you meet those who disbelieve advancing [for battle], do not turn to them your backs [in flight].”

Quran (8:39)

“And fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah . And if they cease – then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do.”

Quran (8:57)

“So if you, [O Muhammad], gain dominance over them in war, disperse by [means of] them those behind them that perhaps they will be reminded.”

Quran (8:59-60)

“And let not those who disbelieve think they will escape. Indeed, they will not cause failure [to Allah ]. And prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allah and your enemy and others besides them whom you do not know [but] whom Allah knows. And whatever you spend in the cause of Allah will be fully repaid to you, and you will not be wronged.”

Quran (8:65)

“O Prophet, urge the believers to battle…”

Quran (8:67)

“It is not for a prophet to have captives [of war] until he inflicts a massacre [upon Allah ‘s enemies] in the land. Some Muslims desire the commodities of this world, but Allah desires [for you] the Hereafter. And Allah is Exalted in Might and Wise.”

Quran (9:5)

“And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.”

Quran (9:14)

“Fight them; Allah will punish them by your hands and will disgrace them and give you victory over them and satisfy the breasts of a believing people”

Quran (9:20)

“The ones who have believed, emigrated and striven in the cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives are greater in rank in the sight of Allah . And it is those who are the attainers [of success].”

Quran (9:29)

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.”

Quran (9:30)

“The Jews say, ‘Ezra is the son of Allah’; and the Christians say, ‘The Messiah is the son of Allah .’ That is their statement from their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved [before them]. May Allah destroy them; how are they deluded?”

Quran (9:38-39)

“O you who have believed, what is [the matter] with you that, when you are told to go forth in the cause of Allah, you adhere heavily to the earth? Are you satisfied with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But what is the enjoyment of worldly life compared to the Hereafter except a [very] little. If you do not go forth, He will punish you with a painful punishment and will replace you with another people, and you will not harm Him at all. And Allah is over all things competent.”

Quran (9:41)

“Go forth, whether light or heavy, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the cause of Allah . That is better for you, if you only knew.”

Quran (9:73)

“O Prophet, fight against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and be harsh upon them. And their refuge is Hell, and wretched is the destination.”

Quran (9:88)

“But the Messenger and those who believed with him fought with their wealth and their lives. Those will have [all that is] good, and it is those who are the successful.”

Quran (9:111)

“Indeed, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur’an. And who is truer to his covenant than Allah ? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment.”

Quran (9:123)

“O you who have believed, fight those adjacent to you of the disbelievers and let them find in you harshness. And know that Allah is with the righteous.”

Quran (17:16)

“And when We intend to destroy a city, We command its affluent but they defiantly disobey therein; so the word comes into effect upon it, and We destroy it with [complete] destruction.”

Quran (18:65-81)

A parable condoning “honor killings”. This parable encourages the murdering of family members who bring shame or dishonor to their family.

Quran (21:44)

“But, [on the contrary], We have provided good things for these [disbelievers] and their fathers until life was prolonged for them. Then do they not see that We set upon the land, reducing it from its borders? So it is they who will overcome?”

Quran (25:52)

“So do not obey the disbelievers, and strive against them with the Qur’an a great striving.”

Quran (33:60-62)

“If the hypocrites and those in whose hearts is disease and those who spread rumors in al-Madinah do not cease, We will surely incite you against them; then they will not remain your neighbors therein except for a little. Accursed wherever they are found, [being] seized and massacred completely. [This is] the established way of Allah with those who passed on before; and you will not find in the way of Allah any change.”

Quran (47:3-4)

“That is because those who disbelieve follow falsehood, and those who believe follow the truth from their Lord. Thus does Allah present to the people their comparisons. So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah – never will He waste their deeds.”

Quran (47:35)

“So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and Allah is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds.”

Quran (48:17)

“There is not upon the blind any guilt or upon the lame any guilt or upon the ill any guilt [for remaining behind]. And whoever obeys Allah and His Messenger – He will admit him to gardens beneath which rivers flow; but whoever turns away – He will punish him with a painful punishment.”

Quran (48:29)

“Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah ; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves. You see them bowing and prostrating [in prayer], seeking bounty from Allah and [His] pleasure. Their mark is on their faces from the trace of prostration. That is their description in the Torah. And their description in the Gospel is as a plant which produces its offshoots and strengthens them so they grow firm and stand upon their stalks, delighting the sowers – so that Allah may enrage by them the disbelievers. Allah has promised those who believe and do righteous deeds among them forgiveness and a great reward.”

Quran (61:4)

“Indeed, Allah loves those who fight in His cause in a row as though they are a [single] structure joined firmly.”

Quran (61:10-12)

“O you who have believed, shall I guide you to a transaction that will save you from a painful punishment? [It is that] you believe in Allah and His Messenger and strive in the cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives. That is best for you, if you should know. He will forgive for you your sins and admit you to gardens beneath which rivers flow and pleasant dwellings in gardens of perpetual residence. That is the great attainment.”

Quran (66:9)

“O Prophet, strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and be harsh upon them. And their refuge is Hell, and wretched is the destination.”

Learn more about why Christianity is different than all other world religions.

KJV Bible Verses Removed From Modern Versions

Are all Bible versions equal? There has been a lot of debate among Christians on this topic. While some Christians believe the version makes no difference, others contend there have been too many changes since the original King James Version. In actuality, there have been changes to the original version & here is a list of KJV Bible verses removed from modern versions.

List of KJV Bible Verses Removed From Newer Versions

Matthew 17:21:

21 Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.

Matthew 18:11:

11 For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.

Matthew 23:14:

14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

Mark 7:17:

17 And when he was entered into the house from the people, his disciples asked him concerning the parable.

Mark 9:44:

44 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.

Mark 9:46:

46 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.

Mark 11:26:

26 But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses.

Mark 15:28:

28 And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, And he was numbered with the transgressors.

Luke 17:36:

36 Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

Luke 23:17:

17 (For of necessity he must release one unto them at the feast.)

John 5:4:

For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had.

Acts 8:37:

37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.

Acts 15:34:

34 Notwithstanding it pleased Silas to abide there still.

Acts 24:7:

But the chief captain Lysias came upon us, and with great violence took him away out of our hands,

Acts 28:29:

29 And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves.

Romans 16:24:

24 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.


In conclusion, those who make the argument that the King James Bible is the most accurate have a valid point. The truth is there have been numerous changes since this version. As we saw above, there have been 16 New Testament KJV Bible verses removed from modern versions like the NIV and ESV. While some are more staunch supporters of King James Bibles only, the author holds less fervent views on this topic.

Want to learn more about the Bible? Read the article “20 Facts About the Book of Job That You Probably Didn’t Know“.